
I had a recent talk with an advertiser, who was interested in buying banner space on this blog. The discussion reminded me why I didn’t want to bother with individual advertisers in the first place.Â
I was trying to tell him that my blog gets 400 uniques/day, and his argument against that was that my Alexa rank was not high enough, and that I was not getting that many visitors in reality. Here is my Alexa traffic rank, it is all public information anyway.
As I was saying, he claimed that a blog with a rank of 330.000 could not get so many visitors, and I was trying to explain to him, that despite the skewed Alexa data, the number you see there is the overall traffic rank. If you look at the bottom of the page, you will see a little graph that shows 65% of my visitors are from the US. And the chart right below that, shows my alexa traffic rank for the US, 73.000.
EDIT: Just to prove how irrelevant Alexa is, look at what Alexa shows as a relevant site to mine.
An analysis changes a lot depending on how you look at it. The pitfall here is when you look at the wrong kind of data. For example, people want to buy links from high PR posts omitting the new posts on authority blogs that are bound to get PR in a few weeks. Dumb, yes, but people do tend to think like that.
It is a good thing to check the numbers, but make sure you are looking at the right ones.
And now a fact I have wanted to point out for a long time: Google Analytics is scrubbing your data.
It really is. The analysis for glowleaf.net shows 1/10th of the visitors! That is a huge gap, it goes far from a simple discrepancy. Just to make sure, I used another 3rd party analytics script, and the data it showed were pretty much the same as my hosting tracking report. Losing 90% of my visitors is a crappy way to report my traffic…
Despite the crappy tracking, the Google Analytics tabs have a lot to tell me about my blog.
Â
Traffic sources, all traffic sources:
Â
| Source/Medium | Visits | Pages/Visit | Avg. Time on Site | % New Visits | Bounce Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. |
(direct) / (none)
|
468 | 1.77 | 00:05:15 | 49.57% | 71.37% |
| 2. |
wickedfire.com / referral
|
91 | 1.32 | 00:01:15 | 52.75% | 79.12% |
| 3. |
google / organic
|
70 | 1.34 | 00:01:17 | 64.29% | 75.71% |
| 4. |
blindapeseo.com / referral
|
14 | 1.57 | 00:02:30 | 35.71% | 57.14% |
| 5. |
forums.digitalpoint.com / referral
|
14 | 1.07 | 00:00:12 | 85.71% | 92.86% |
| 6. |
cull.gr / referral
|
11 | 1.09 | 00:00:35 | 100.00% | 90.91% |
| 7. |
bobit.gr / referral
|
8 | 1.12 | 00:03:29 | 75.00% | 87.50% |
| 8. |
bluehatseo.com / referral
|
3 | 10.67 | 00:51:53 | 66.67% | 33.33% |
| 9. |
yahoo / organic
|
3 | 1.00 | 00:00:00 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| 10. |
adbrite.com / referral
|
2 | 1.00 | 00:00:00 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| 11. |
contempt.me / referral
|
2 | 2.50 | 00:02:44 | 50.00% | 50.00% |
| 12. |
insomnia.gr / referral
|
2 | 1.00 | 00:00:00 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
The avg time on site column is what I see as the most important, and it is worth noting that a simple comment on bluehatseo gave me a loyal reader. 5 minutes on average for the majority of my visitors are enough for me.
Visitors, depth of visit:
Â
| Depth of Visit | Visits | Percentage of all visitors |
|---|---|---|
| 1 pages | 520.00 | 73.97% |
| 2 pages | 94.00 | 13.37% |
| 3 pages | 33.00 | 4.69% |
| 4 pages | 22.00 | 3.13% |
| 5 pages | 13.00 | 1.85% |
| 6 pages | 2.00 | 0.28% |
| 7 pages | 9.00 | 1.28% |
| 8 pages | 2.00 | 0.28% |
Here we see that my readers are shallow diggers, with hardly more than one page visited on average.
Visitors, Loyalty:
Â
| Number of Visits | Visits | Percentage of all visitors |
|---|---|---|
| 1 times | 384.00 | 54.62% |
| 2 times | 44.00 | 6.26% |
| 3 times | 20.00 | 2.84% |
| 4 times | 13.00 | 1.85% |
| 5 times | 12.00 | 1.71% |
| 6 times | 9.00 | 1.28% |
| 7 times | 8.00 | 1.14% |
| 8 times | 7.00 | 1.00% |
| 9-14 times | 39.00 | 5.55% |
| 15-25 times | 45.00 | 6.40% |
| 26-50 times | 40.00 | 5.69% |
| 101-200 times | 66.00 | 9.39% |
| 201+ times | 16.00 | 2.28% |
This table on the contrary, shows us that half the visitors are repeat readers, with a nice percentage of ~20% coming back for more than 20 times. The information we derive from this table and the previous is that the shallow diggers we saw earlier are basically repeat visitors who stay updated on every post.
A thing we can do to fix that problem of shallow visitors, is to use plugins that show relevant posts etc.
Visitors, length of visit:
Â
| Length of Visit | Visits | Percentage of all visitors |
|---|---|---|
| 0-10 seconds | 522.00 | 74.25% |
| 11-30 seconds | 9.00 | 1.28% |
| 31-60 seconds | 10.00 | 1.42% |
| 61-180 seconds | 39.00 | 5.55% |
| 181-600 seconds | 49.00 | 6.97% |
| 601-1,800 seconds | 44.00 | 6.26% |
| 1,801+ seconds | 30.00 | 4.27% |
This table shows us something interesting. While 75% of the visitors barely skim the site (maybe its the big fat smileys on top that deter them, but who cares…) we have a loyal percentage of ~20% who are definately reading the posts, and when we factor in the repeat visits from the other tables, we see that they do so often.
Traffic sources, keywords:
Â
| 4. | 5 | 2.20 | 00:08:19 | 40.00% | 40.00% |
I just had to write this, it is so funny that I cannot bear it! Average time on site 8+ minutes from the “wickedfire skittles” google search, making that keyword the biggest avg time on site on the keywords page…
All that data, gives me the information that 20% of my readers, that is 80 out of the 400 daily visitors, are my loyal readers, who keep coming back for more (no idea why…)
Sounds good enough for me. Now, where can I find an advertiser that will rent adspace based on 80 loyal uniques/day?
Screw that, I am just waiting for these guys to go live… (crappy anchor text courtesy of their non inclusion in their beta phase of my blog)
Related Blogs
- Related Blogs on awstats
- awstats faqs
- Related Blogs on google analytics
- Google Analytics Site Search Setup Guide
- Google Analytics Plugin for Wordpress
- Google offering UK Analytics users £75 of AdWords advertising
- Related Blogs on statistical data
- Essays on Punctuality: Points to Consider
- Search Engine Optimization Tips and Techniques
- lung gastric and brain cancers
- Related Blogs on website analysis
- Analyzing Web Site Traffic
- Keil C51 main line peripheral device operation question thorough …
- One kind of novel completely off and on clamp electric current …
- Want More Traffic to your Spiderweb Marketing System Website
- ARM9 micro controller LPC3180 software and hardware platform design
Popularity: 20% [?]







November 6th, 2008 at 9:48 am
on top of all of these stats there are rss stats — i almost never visit a site if i have the option of viewing the full feed thru a reader (damn u cakes)
November 6th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Yes, RSS skews the data even more. But Feedburner gives a lot of data as well, so if you combine the tables you have a pretty accurate image.
I believe that blogs should give full feeds, the people who read the posts strictly on their RSS readers are few anyway. I also get mad when a website tries to control my browser, and partial feeds fall in the same category for me.
November 13th, 2008 at 11:59 am
Hi,
I came across your site: http://www.glowleaf.net/google-analytics-is-scrubbing-your-data/. I am looking to purchase text links on high quality data analytics and marketing related websites for a period between 3-6 months. Do you have any rates for your website in mind? The website I am looking to promote is: http://www.cogentdataanalytics.com/. We would like to use: Segmentation Analysis – as the link text. If you are interested in selling a link to me please could you let me know – the method of payment we can pay by is Paypal – If you are unfamiliar with this, feel free to look at the site http://www.paypal.com. Thanks for your time and I look forward to hearing from you soon.
regards
November 13th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Your layout sucks. I would rather link to a Russian splog.
December 3rd, 2008 at 7:09 am
[...] I analyzed this blog a while ago, I did the exact same thing. Note where I said, nevermind the “hit and run” [...]