review plugin for wordpress
Jun 30

Warning! Disturbing Images Of website gore. If you read this post, you will be tormented by terrible nightmares of your precious websites been eaten by social multifaced beasts.

I just had my first site crashed by the sheer power of the facebook like button.

Most webmasters are familiar with the “digg effect”, or at least the effect of any major social site that suddenly sends thousands of hits per second to your site. It doesn’t have to be digg.

In order to explain this post better, I whipped up some crude shots of how I imagine the two effects.

This is how I imagine the Digg effect:

the digg effect

Yeap, this is what happens to a site when it gets frontpaged on Digg, or any other big social cesspool like Reddit or Stumble. Of course there are the pictures of burned servers etc, but that is the aftermath. This is the action shot.

Now, here is what happens to a site when it reaches the level of 4000 likes per hour, the Like effect:

like effect

It doesn’t seem that bad, does it? Well, lets go deeper and you will understand. When you implement the open graph protocol, you basically add some metadata to your pages so that facebook knows what to show on a user’s stream.

On your server logs, you will see this dreaded line of text:

Browser Type: facebookexternalhit/1.1 (+http://www.facebook.com/externalhit_uatext.php)

That is not a visitor, that is the facebook bot pulling the metadata, every time someone loads a facebook page with an external like line.

So, if for example 100 people liked your page, and for simplicity’s sake lets say 2 of each of those people’s friends visited their profile page, you would have instant 300 metadata pulls off your site. I am sure that facebook has some sort of a short-lived caching in place, but from the practical data that I see, the metadata gets pulled quite often.

On my case, my moderate VPS crashed 10 times in a single day when people started liking and visiting and re-liking and spreading the word. I think, that facebook’s multiple servers were pulling data from my website from different locations, like the hands on the picture. Simply put, a DOS attack.

And if that doesn’t seem that bad, remember that you actually do get visitors from facebook likes. And the like plugin loads data from facebook again, to show the like count. And images get reposted on facebook streams (when the user likes and leaves a comment, RTFM), with an average of 200 friends per user. So the images get hotlinked, the site loads for the users, the metadata gets pulled every few seconds. I believe the scientific term for this is “clusterfuck”.

The worst of all is that the caching plugin didn’t help that much. Usually, with a cache you get to survive a digg effect, but in the like effect, it pulls on the server CPU and the cache does not save the day.

We still don’t know if the facebook likes have any SEO value, and the traffic is the standard low quality social one. From what I have seen, it is not viable to maintain a powerful server for viral content with low conversion rates.

Has anyone experienced the Like effect? Have you found a way to ease the impact?

Popularity: 1% [?]

written by Glowleaf \\ tags: , , , ,

Sep 12

As I always do, I read two magnificent posts on other SEO blogs, and came up with my own, brand new, twisted version. 

First of all, read this post on how to write good content for your website, I believe its an excellent read.

Then, read the headsmacking tip from SEOmoz on testing a site with ppc.

Do you see the synergy? No? Oh well… It was silly of me to believe I could end the post right here.

Here it is:

Make categories of your content. Of course, that means that you actually do have content, 100 pages is a minimum. Separate them with tags like:

  • Spoonfeds (10 ways to get fat in 3 weeks eating just icecream and hamburgers)
  • Lists (15 things about the Aardvark that noone really wants to know)
  • Howto (How to stop peeing your pants by getting a bigger penis)
  • Rant (This world is not real. There is no spoon.)
  • News (Oops, she did it again… She played with his heart…)
  • Reviews (This site is THA shit)
  • Hatred (He bit me! Mom!)
  • Salespitch (Buy now, or HE will take your firstborn)
  • Etc…

Now, you need to research the social sites. Find top stumblers, diggers, whateverers, all those people who have nothing better to do with their lives than to find “interesting stuff” on the net.

Locate one top submitter, for every one of your tags, whose submissions fall in the same tag as your content. E.g. some top submitter who has 98% hatred submissions, gets the “hatred” tag. Got it?

There is no technique here, you just have to find the top taggers for every one of your categories. Find what they like, and feed them with it.

Now, you can do this the sneaky way, or the straight up way. 

The sneaky way is to start up a conversation. Following our “hatred” example, send him a pm about how big mofos the guys at microsoft are, and how horny does your Macbook make you when you touch the touchpad.

Become friends through the system, and feed him stories without saying that they are yours, with angry comments, according to the story. Now let him rant about it and share the hatred with his other I-have-no-hobbies buddies.

The straight up way, is to contact a top tagger, and feed his ego, about how good his submissions are, how beautifully hand picked they are, and how he should work for the Times. Then send him your story, and ask for an honest review.

So, you might ask, why is this any different that the classic “make friends and share your linkbait” strategy?

There is a huge difference. This, if it hits, is a critical hit. Critical meaning frontpage, meaning getting tagged by a thousand people. Or, getting buried in an instant. All or nothing.

You need to understand, that this is the ultimate benchmark for your linkbait. Its all or nothing, get high or crash.

That way, you can go through your content fast, weeding out the crap ones. After 10 or so “suggestions”, you will have a pretty good idea of what “sells”. Then make more. And feed it. To the right people. Yes… to the sneezers.

Related Blogs

  • Related Blogs on content

Popularity: 14% [?]

written by Glowleaf \\ tags: , , , , ,